“双一流”建设方案公布后，突出学科建设的逻辑思路成为我国新常态下高等 教育发展路径上的重要转折。运用文献资料法和逻辑分析法，对中国、德国、法国、英国、 美国和日本6 个国家学科目录中体育学的设置问题进行考察和分析。研究认为：体育学 在各国高等教育领域已获得普遍的学科认同和独立的学科地位；德国、法国、英国和美国 的国家科学基金尚未对体育学独立设置并进行基金资助，体育学在科学研究领域的整体 认同度偏低；体育学的学科地位将取决于自身科学化的水平；体育学在单个国家内部普 遍形成了统一的学科名称，但国际上尚未形成统一认识，各国对体育学的学科归属认识尚 不统一，学科基本理论研究亟待加强；体育学总体呈现出交叉学科的定位与研究趋势，我 国体育学在学科归属上应当向交叉学科类目靠拢。

After the launch of the“ Double World-class” Project, discipline construction has been highlighted as an important turning point in the development of higher education in China’s new normal, This paper investigates and analyzes the inclusion or non-inclusion of Sports Science in the national discipline catalogues of six countries, including China, Germany, France, Britain, America and Japan. This research finds that ： 1. Sport Science has won wide recognition as an independent discipline in the field of higher education; 2. Sport Science has yet to be separated out and funded by the National Science Foundations in Germany, France, Britain and the United States, indicating a fairly low degree of recognition in the field of scientific research; 3. the status of Sport Science as a discipline depends on the level of its own scientificness; 4. Sports Science has a unified discipline name within a single country, but the international community has not yet achieved a consensus as to where it belongs, and the basic theoretical research of Sport Science as a discipline should be strengthened; 5. overall, Sport Science presents itself as interdisciplinary, and in China it should be classified more as an interdiscipline than as anything else.

G80-05

国家社科基金重大招标项目：体育学基本理论与学科体系建构研究（14ZDB128）。