后脱钩时代不再单纯强调单项体育协会如何“去行政化”，更为关注其独特治理功能的实现。 在明晰单项体育协会角色定位的基础上，回到当下分类改革实践中，阐释各类单项体育协会融入体育治理体系现代化的多元路径。研究认为：①对于奥运争光类协会，提出“参治型”路径，即坚持与完善竞技体育治理的主导型政府角色，提升协会服务奥运争光战略的意识与能力，构建协会参与竞技体育治理的柔性化机制。②对于职业体育类协会，提出“共治型”路径，即加大体育市场治理的简政放权力度，与相关利益主体建立协作治理关系，坚持共益组织的组织定位。③对于群众体育类协会，提出“自治型”路径，即构建协会自主性的政府支持机制，提升协会的社会动员能力，加强协会的专业化服务能力建设。

In the post-decoupling era，more concerns are given to the realization of the unique governance functions of the sports associations，rather than simple emphasis on the “de-administration” of the associations. On the basis of clarifying the role orientation of sport associations，the present study is linked with the current classification reform practice，and explains the multiple paths of integrating sport associations into the modern sports governance system. According to the research.①For the Olympic glory associations，this study proposes a “participatory governance” approach，that is，to adhere to and improve the leading role of the government in competitive sports governance，to enhance the awareness and ability of the association to serve the Olympic glory strategy，and to build a flexible mechanism for the association to participate in competitive sports governance. ② For professional sports associations，the “co-governance” path was proposed，that is，to strengthen the simplification of administration and decentralization of sports market governance，establish a cooperative governance relationship with relevant stakeholders，and adhere to the orientation of the association of co-benefit organizations. ③ For mass sports associations，the “autonomous” path was proposed，that is，to build the independent government support mechanism of the associations，improve the social mobilization capacity of the associations，and strengthen the professional service capacity construction of the associations

G812.1

国家社会科学基金一般项目 （10BTY031）