案例研究作为社会科学中连接理论与实践的核心方法，在体育学研究中日趋流行的同时，衍 生出一些知识生产的误区。依据理论负载程度由低至高，上述误区依次表现为“现象描述”“循环论证” 和“理论套用”。若想消解这些误区，需妥善处理好案例与理论之间的关系，具体可通过“理论修正”“理 论拓展”“理论深化”等方式，将案例研究的理论负载程度保持在合理区间。该研究弥补了体育学领域 对案例研究知识生产误区缺乏讨论的缺陷，能为后续的体育学案例研究提供指导与方法论启示。

As a core method linking theory and practice in social sciences，case study has become increasingly prevalent in sports studies. Meanwhile，it has given rise to certain misconceptions in knowledge production. Ranked from low to high in terms of the level of theory-ladenness，these misconceptions are manifested as phenomenological description，circular reasoning，and mechanical theoretical application. To resolve these misconceptions，it is essential to properly handle the relationship between cases and theories. Speci?cally，the level of theoretical ladenness in case studies can be maintained within a reasonable range through approaches such as theoretical revision，theoretical expansion，and theoretical deepening. This study ?lls the gap regarding the lack of discussions on knowledge production misconceptions in sports science case studies，and can provide guidance and methodological implications for future case study research in sports science.

G80-3

中国博士后科学基金第77批面上资助项目（2025M773179）；2025年湖北省教育厅高校哲学社会科学研究重点项目（25D094）