在中国体育哲学反思既有研究范式、推进实践哲学改造的背景下，“语言”在体育知识生成与 实践中的运作有待重新审视。现有研究存在“实操性证成”的认识论倾向，其虽强调具身体验，却试图构 建一套普遍适用的“规范性法则”，从而陷入一种隐蔽的“还原论”误区。研究借由维特根斯坦的“语言 游戏”概念，对这一倾向进行哲学审视与“治疗”。研究认为：体育实践中的语言不是对既有知识的静态 表征，而是交织于特定情境、在参与者的在场互动中与实践共同生成的动态过程。这一过程源于个体在 特定情境中的非释义性把握，并最终在群体共享的“生活形式”中获得其确定性。由此，体育知识并非对 体育实践完成状态的预测或表征，而是与实践一同展开的行动可能性。唯有从实践与语言相互交织的 视角出发，才能真正摆脱对自然科学范式的路径依赖，从而为体育知识的生成提供必要的哲学澄清。

Against the backdrop of Chinese sports philosophy re?ecting upon existing research paradigms and advancing the transformation toward practical philosophy，the operation of “language” within the generation and practice of sports knowledge warrants re-examination. However，existing research exhibits an epistemological tendency toward “operational justi?cation”— one that，despite emphasizing embodied experience，attempts to construct a set of universally applicable “normative laws”， thereby falling into a subtle trap of “reductionism”. Drawing upon Wittgenstein’s later concept of “language games”，this paper subjects such a tendency to philosophical scrutiny and “therapeutic” intervention. The study argues that language in sports practice is not a static representation of pre-existing knowledge，but rather a dynamic process intertwined with speci?c contexts，co-generated with the practice itself through the situated interactions of participants. This process originates from an individual’s non-interpretive grasp of a speci?c situation and ultimately derives its certainty from a “form of life” shared by the collective. Consequently，sports knowledge is neither a prediction nor a representation of the completed state of sports practice；rather，it constitutes a set of possibilities for action that unfold in tandem with the practice itself. We can truly break free from a path dependency on natural science paradigms only by adopting a perspective that views practice and language as mutually intertwined，thereby providing the necessary philosophical clari?cation for the generation of sports knowledge.

G80-05